discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocotron


From: Tima Vaisburd
Subject: Re: Cocotron
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:26:03 -0800
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

Gregory,

On Sunday 24 December 2006 04:15, Helge Hess wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2006, at 03:00, Gregory John Casamento wrote:

> > Now that I'm Chief Maintainer  [...]  I'm concentrating my
> > efforts on focusing the project on the goal I stated above.
> > GNUstep is an crossplatform development environment and API only.
> [...]
> > It is not a desktop, nor is it going to be an OS clone.

May I ask you to CC the important statements about the project direction
to the list? I'm following the discussion and did not find your letter with 
the things you "stated above".

I'm sure Helge makes a fair job quoting you, but still it would be easier -
and more fair to you - to get it from you directly.

While I'm totally agree with "API only" course there was another
thing (also brought by Helge Hess) where I agree less:

> From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
> > On Dec 24, 2006, at 24:35, Gregory John Casamento wrote:

> > The projects libFoundation, Cocotron and AJRFoundation are re- 
> > implementations of Foundation/AppKit. There is no reason, aside  
> > from obstinance or ego which should cause so many projects with  
> > similar or identical goals to develop things in parallel.  It is,  
> > purely and simply, an egregious waste of time and effort.   Well  
> > understood, but not reasonable at all.

I understand your disappointment, but it can't be just ego.
Something must have not worked in GNUstep for them.
I think it's worth to understand what it was.

Thank you,
Tima
    




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]