[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)
From: |
Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty) |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:19:23 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0a1 (X11/20060724) |
hns@computer.org wrote:
>> are a lot of web browsers around and just a couple of engines. So we
>> could steal ideas and code snippets and prove that Objective-C and
>> GNUstep are a better base for an engine then anything else around.
>>
>
>
>>>> The beauty of Objective-C is it's expandability. So I guess the best
>>>> way would be to write a browser application as a stand-alone (i.e.
>>>> WITHOUT a build-in WWW engine) providing just the basics, that is, a
>>>> window (with tabs) that holds the documents (i.e. web pages) and the
>>>> navigation bar. Everything else is implemented via "plugins."
>>>>
>
> That can be done with any rendering engine as long as it uses a
> compatible
> implementation of WebView (and perhaps WebFrame).
>
>
>> Prove those C++ coders wrong and make the world (wide web) a better place.
>>
>
> What I (and all those who have attended the FOSDEM meeting) always
> wonder,
> is that the same ideas come up again and again.
>
> I think it is worth to mention SimpleWebKit here - a rough
> implementation of
> WebView, WebFrame, WebFrameView, WebDataSource etc. - completely
> written
> in Objective-C without any C++. The reason is that it must cross-
> compile
> on gcc 2.95.3 for some ARM processors.
>
> Here is the source code to look at:
> http://www.quantum-step.com/download/sources/mySTEP/SimpleWebKit/
>
> It is not complete but does HTML parsing - HTML rendering is not yet
> available since I don't completely understand
> the interaction between WebHTMLDocumentRepresentation, DOMHTML and the
> WebHTMLView classes.
>
>
Can we make it handle xml and xslt?
> All the other parts work - loading an URL, notifying end of load,
> handling different MIME etc.
>
> So, volunteers to participate are very welcome!
>
>
> @Jesse Ross:
>
> One question is of course if this will satisfy the Bounty conditions -
> it is NOT WebKit ported, it is a compatible reimplementation.
>
> rgds, Nikolaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
>
rogelio.vcf
Description: Vcard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: WebKit Bounty, (continued)
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Chris B. Vetter, 2007/03/02
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Rogelio Serrano, 2007/03/02
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Chris B. Vetter, 2007/03/02
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Camille Bourgoin, 2007/03/02
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Chris B. Vetter, 2007/03/02
- Re: WebKit Bounty, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2007/03/02
- GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Dennis Leeuw, 2007/03/02
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Camille Bourgoin, 2007/03/02
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Andrew Satori, 2007/03/02
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), address@hidden, 2007/03/02
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty),
Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), address@hidden, 2007/03/03
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Riccardo, 2007/03/03
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Thom Cherryhomes, 2007/03/03
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2007/03/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), address@hidden, 2007/03/04
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Adam Fedor, 2007/03/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), address@hidden, 2007/03/05
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2007/03/05
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Jesse Ross, 2007/03/05
- Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty), Chris B. Vetter, 2007/03/06