discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?


From: Yves de Champlain
Subject: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:03:33 -0400

Hi

After upgrading to make-2.0, I find many many many packages now just break at compile (I'm not tlaking about my personnal issue with back-0.12).

Is it too early to upgrade ? Like it is for Vista ? (oh boy, that was mean ...)

I'm provoking a bit, but it would have been darn simple if every developer had taken a __few_minutes__ to fix his own stuff.

- Many packages still die trying if GNUstep.sh was not sourced
- Some try to link with Framework/Version/A
- Some have GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DIR all over the place

I mean, why doesn't anybody care ? I find make-2.0 very a good step (not joking), but even ProjectCenter, a core GNUstep app is not "2.0- ready".

Ok, I admit, I had a rough day yesterday ... and I always say coding is better than yelling, but every now and then, the great discussion of "The Future of GNUstep"(TM) comes along on this list, what else can I say ... I feel like it will be many months before I can upgrade gnustep-core without patching 20 or so other packages. Bleak future if you ask.

yves





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]