[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:45:11 +0200 (CEST) |
Thanks Yves ... a few comments:
0. yes, you should upgrade! :-)
1. if you find something that is not ready for gnustep-make 2.x, fix it and
submit patches to the authors ;-)
2. if you find anything that is not ready on the GNUstep repository, send me
the patches (or just the bug report) and I'll fix the makefiles and commit the
changes myself
3. if you can't fix an external software, I'll fix it for you. Just send me
the code / a link to the code :-)
4. I actually already submitted patches upgrading their makefiles (in a
backwards-compatible way) to a few external projects (I tested gnustep-make 2.x
on a variety of random GNUstep projects I downloaded from the internet), but
I'm not sure the changes were ever incorporated as I don't think I got any reply
Finally, ProjectCenter is particularly difficult because it's not just a matter
of compiling the program, but the program itself is creating/maintaining
makefiles.
I guess I'll slowly update/fix it as reports come in.
Thanks
PS: And upgrading to gnustep-make 2.x can't harm too much because it you use it
in the same way as you used gnustep-make 1.x, everything (well, almost) should
work the same
-----Original Message-----
From: Yves de Champlain <yves@gnu-darwin.org>
Sent: Sat, April 28, 2007 7:03 pm
To: GNUstep Discuss-gnustep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Subject: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?
Hi
After upgrading to make-2.0, I find many many many packages now just
break at compile (I'm not tlaking about my personnal issue with
back-0.12).
Is it too early to upgrade ? Like it is for Vista ? (oh boy, that
was mean ...)
I'm provoking a bit, but it would have been darn simple if every
developer had taken a __few_minutes__ to fix his own stuff.
- Many packages still die trying if GNUstep.sh was not sourced
- Some try to link with Framework/Version/A
- Some have GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DIR all over the place
I mean, why doesn't anybody care ? I find make-2.0 very a good step
(not joking), but even ProjectCenter, a core GNUstep app is not "2.0-
ready".
Ok, I admit, I had a rough day yesterday ... and I always say coding
is better than yelling, but every now and then, the great discussion
of "The Future of GNUstep"(TM) comes along on this list, what else
can I say ... I feel like it will be many months before I can upgrade
gnustep-core without patching 20 or so other packages. Bleak future
if you ask.
yves
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, (continued)
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Fred Kiefer, 2007/04/28
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Wolfgang Sourdeau, 2007/04/29
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Stefan Bidigaray, 2007/04/29
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Tim McIntosh, 2007/04/29
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Andrew Ruder, 2007/04/29
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Stefan Bidigaray, 2007/04/29
- Re: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?, Tim McIntosh, 2007/04/29
RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?,
Nicola Pero <=