Re: LLVM

[Nicola Pero]

> Or to put it another way, I don't think we should be including a  
> compiler
> or runtime *at* *all* as part of GNustep - it should be "choose your
> Objective-C compiler" as then it gets on with it. Possibly easier
> said than done though :-)

I agree - choice is good for users - if there are more than one  
Objective-C compilers
available, we should let users use whatever they want (even if they  
were proprietary).
That's great.  We love giving users a choice.

But in terms of contributions, I don't see why we should contribute  
anything to LLVM.
We should improve the GCC compiler/runtime, or write a new better GNU  
GPL one. :-)

Thanks