Re: Comparing @encode() output

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 18 Jun 2009, at 12:23, Stefan Bidigaray wrote:

> Thanks Richard.  I'll use an approach close to what you mentioned  
> there.  Since I'll be doing something like that I might go a step  
> further and also try to support other data types (like uLaw and aLaw  
> audio).  Do you think it would be a good idea to define some enum  
> values to be passed?

Yes,  sounds great to enumerate the supported types of data rather  
than just having a boolean.