[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: framework
From: |
Michael Thaler |
Subject: |
Re: framework |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:24:31 +0200 |
Hi,
> Why? Objective-C is much better than either... it's a very good
> server solution (C++ is too inflexible and Java is slow/clumsy).
Im my opinion this is just spreading prejudices. I seriously doubt that Java is
much slower then Objective C. Have a look at:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&box=1
Objective C is not in the list but I doubt that Objective C would be much
faster then Java if you actually use Objective C and not just a plain C subset.
And Scala also runs on the JVM and is also quite fast and it is a very nice,
modern language which is not clumsy at all.
C++ with a good library like Qt (which is LGPL now) offers many of the
advantages of Objective C. In addition it is possible to program both abstract
and fast in C++, which is not possible in Objective C. Just try to write an
efficient and easy to use vector class in Objective C (not using plain C). I
doubt that you can get it really performant.
That being said, Objective C is a nice language and I do not say it is not a
good alternative for server side programming. I just do not like people
spreading prejudices which are basically wrong.
Michael
- Re: framework, (continued)
- Re: framework, David Chisnall, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: framework, Yavor Doganov, 2009/08/28
- Re: framework, David Chisnall, 2009/08/28
- Re: framework, Yavor Doganov, 2009/08/28
Re: framework,
Michael Thaler <=