[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: framework
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
Subject: |
Re: framework |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:47:49 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
В Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:21:48 +0100, David Chisnall написа:
> If you are linking against a GPL'd framework, you do not have to make
> your code GPL'd, you have to release your code under a GPL-compatible
> license.
This is not accurate. If you distribute your code and it links against a
GPL'ed library, you *must* license it under the GPL. That's the whole
point in using GPL for libraries:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html
IOW, any application or library that links with (say) the GNU Scientific
Library (GSL) must be GPLv3 or later.
OTOH, if he doesn't distribute his code at all, all licensing
considerations are moot.
- Re: framework, (continued)
- Re: framework, Riccardo Mottola, 2009/08/26
- Re: framework, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/26
- Re: framework, David Chisnall, 2009/08/26
- Re: framework, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/26
- Re: framework, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/27
- NSopenGL, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, David Chisnall, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, Thomas Gamper, 2009/08/27
- Re: framework, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: framework,
Yavor Doganov <=
- Re: framework, David Chisnall, 2009/08/28
- Re: framework, Yavor Doganov, 2009/08/28
Re: framework, Michael Thaler, 2009/08/27