[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libobjc2 release?
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: libobjc2 release? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:18:17 +0000 |
On 15 Mar 2010, at 12:59, David Chisnall wrote:
> The solution in other test suites is to mark it as an expected failure.
> Then, if it fails the user gets a 1 Expected Failure in the output and
> ignores it, but if it works for a developer they get 1 Unexpected Pass and
> have a look to see what it was. We could do this quite easily with an
> xfail() version of the pass() function.
Which, by the look of it, is exactly what you did in svn half an hour before I
wrote this email.
hope() - I love the name! Only now my hopes are dashed whenever I run the test
suite :-(
David
- Re: libobjc2 release?, (continued)
- Re: libobjc2 release?, Truls Becken, 2010/03/12
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: libobjc2 release?, David Chisnall, 2010/03/13
- Re: libobjc2 release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/03/13
- Re: libobjc2 release?, David Chisnall, 2010/03/13
- Re: libobjc2 release?, Nicola Pero, 2010/03/14
- Re: libobjc2 release?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/03/15
- test suite [Was: libobjc2 release?], Fred Kiefer, 2010/03/15
- Re: libobjc2 release?, David Chisnall, 2010/03/15
- Re: libobjc2 release?,
David Chisnall <=