|
From: | Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: | Re: removing spatial viewer from GWorkspace |
Date: | Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:52:27 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100418 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 |
Hi,
it is indeed, but many people didn't like it back then either. I am investigating if opinions changed. Some features are a bit a "hype", they come with a trend, they fade silently again.It was added after a discussion on the mailing list long ago, it was a popular opinion.This is usually a good reason for keeping something, but then...
I never use itNeither is this - there is lots of stuff in GNUstep that I don't use, but try not to break just for the sake of it (or, at least, which I apologise to Richard about when I do break it).
I am trying to understand if there are other users of it and if, how many.
Currently yes, version 0.8.8 which I intend to release soon shall be more a maintenance release of bug fixes, build issues, crashes and general code clean-up. However, while looking a th the code base, it is legit to look in the future.and it adds code in GWorkspace that needs to be kept from bitrotting.Bit rot generally only happens when you make large changes to GWorkspace. My understanding is that you are currently just engaged in bug fixing and making GWorkspace into something less of an unmaintainable mess, so bit rot should not be a big issue.
Assessing the usage is my current goal. Currently the code has a wide degree of duplication, which enhances the effort of maintenance. If it is deemed a truly essential feature a way of factoring out common code about the two modes and thus enhancing maintenance needs to be found.The correct time to ask this question is when you've made, or about to make, changes that will make the spacial mode difficult to maintain. If there is only one user of a feature, but it takes very little effort to maintain, then it's a bad idea to delete it - all that we do is alienate users for no gain.
Thom's answer is so rough and impulsive that maybe it is not even trustworthy that he is really using it!
Cheers, Riccardo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |