[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sony SNAP
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: Sony SNAP |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:31:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.0.10 Thunderbird/3.0.10 |
Am 20.11.2010 15:46, schrieb Riccardo Mottola:
> Furthermore, in some of the links Gregory posted, they describe our
> adherence to OpenStep and our following of cocoa in this manner:
>
> * They add methods and classes, either from Cocoa or their own
> extensions, if they add substantial value and don't interfere with
> OpenStep and/or Cocoa compatibility.
> * They generally don't remove things unless there is a clearly
> better implementation in newer Cocoa API
> * Where there is a real problem with a change, they will attempt
> find a technically superior work-around. In rare cases, this might
> involve a change in the original OpenStep API
>
>
> I personally like this description! It also shows some blue in the sky,
> given the current bashing and destructive thread we are having here lately.
Great that you like these statements. They are actually taken from our
GNUstep mission statement :-)
http://www.gnustep.org/information/mission.html
But I have to admit that this is really deeply hidden in our web site
and it took me some time to find, even though I know what I was looking
for.