[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fast enumeration
From: |
Jens Ayton |
Subject: |
Re: Fast enumeration |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:43:38 +0100 |
On Feb 9, 2011, at 21:16, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
>
> I think Riccardo was referring to the macros that where proposed by Jens
> in his original mail. You know how he reacts on seeing C99 mentioned.
> As far as I know your macros should be fine even by Riccardo's standards
> and I really would like to see them in a public header. We should let
> Richard decide which one.
For reference, my post was mostly intended for anyone else wanting to use fast
enumeration with a fallback in application code, hence my cavalier handwaving
of the C99 requirement. It would of course be marginally easier for me if
GNUstep didn't add identical macros. :-)
--
Jens Ayton
- Re: Fast enumeration, (continued)
- Re: Fast enumeration, Jens Ayton, 2011/02/04
- Re: Fast enumeration, Nicola Pero, 2011/02/04
- Re: Fast enumeration, Fred Kiefer, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Jens Ayton, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Jens Ayton, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/02/09
- Re: Fast enumeration, David Chisnall, 2011/02/09
- Re: Fast enumeration, Fred Kiefer, 2011/02/09
- Re: Fast enumeration,
Jens Ayton <=
- Re: Fast enumeration, David Chisnall, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Fred Kiefer, 2011/02/07
- Re: Fast enumeration, Ivan Vučica, 2011/02/04
Re: Fast enumeration, David Chisnall, 2011/02/04