[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next GNUstep releases
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: Next GNUstep releases |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:20:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 SUSE/3.0.11 Thunderbird/3.0.11 |
Am 09.02.2011 18:49, schrieb David Chisnall:
> At FOSDEM, Fred also suggested re-running the clang static analyser
> and fixing the bugs that it finds before the next release. I've got
> some new results for -base, but I haven't finished setting up the
> dependencies for -gui on the machine that's fast enough to run the
> analyser in a timely fashion. I hope to do this later in the week.
>
> David
Hi David,
I just found a new version of the GUI analysis on your server. Thank you
for doing this!
The first few entries are false positives, but looking at the code I
wish the static analysis was right :-)
Cheers
Fred
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, (continued)
- Re: Next GNUstep releases (was: Re: Status of gnustep for gcc-4.6), Nicola Pero, 2011/02/02
- Re: Next GNUstep releases (was: Re: Status of gnustep for gcc-4.6), Ivan Vučica, 2011/02/08
- Re: Next GNUstep releases (was: Re: Status of gnustep for gcc-4.6), Stefan Bidi, 2011/02/08
- Next GNUstep releases (was: Re: Status of gnustep for gcc-4.6), Gregory Casamento, 2011/02/08
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/02/09
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, Nicola Pero, 2011/02/09
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, Gregory Casamento, 2011/02/09
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, David Chisnall, 2011/02/09
- Re: Next GNUstep releases,
Fred Kiefer <=
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, David Chisnall, 2011/02/09
- Re: Next GNUstep releases, Fred Kiefer, 2011/02/09