Re: Building Performance

[artware]

Richard,

That worked like a charm! Thanks so much for committing the change.

Ben


On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
<richard@tiptree.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> The class is explicitly designed and documented as not allowing additional 
> instance variables in subclasses, so it doesn't matter that it's size is not 
> theoretically not constant ... the compiler is complaining abut something 
> that doesn't happen.  However, it may be that there's no way to tell that 
> compiler to carry on and ignore this.
> I'm not really familiar with clang/llvm, but perhaps there's a flag to tell 
> it to treat this as a warning (it's a perfectly reasonable warning) rather 
> than as an error?
> Alternatively, you can use gcc as your compiler :-)
>
> That being said, I've committed a small change to try to avoid this warning 
> (though I haven't tested it as I don't have clang/llvm installed).