|
From: | Philippe Roussel |
Subject: | Re: Ubuntu 11.10 packages from svn |
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:46:20 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
Le 14/03/2012 20:23, Ivan Vučica a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:19, Philippe Roussel<p.o.roussel@free.fr> wrote:Well, I'm far from a packaging expert but I think it's considered bad form to include a debian folder in the sources. Some of the files on this folder as to be changed for each distribution, for each modifications etc. But I could be wrong so let's ask Yavor Doganov who first packaged SimpleAgenda for Debian. What could possibly be done is repository of .deb diffs of GNUstep applications and libraries ? Not sure it would be really useful as we can find those diffs on debian.org.Both ways are described in Debian documentation, but the "no-debian-folder" is encouraged.
Note to self : check the documentation before replying :o) Thanks for the info.
When I target Debian, I personally prefer adding a debian/ folder (or a way to replicate it), because I want to be able to produce an official package easily, and I want my users to be able to pull a revision from VCS at random, and produce a package from it.
For one particular package yes but I don't think this is manageable here. It would mean adding debian/ folders in gnustep svn, gap cvs, textedit git etc.
If someone's up for it, it may be a good idea to make an official build ruleset (even if stored separately), as well as make it possible to use GNUmakefiles for generating the debian/ folder for libraries and apps.
If I manage to build usable packages and people start using them, I will try to automate the process, cleanup the debian parts, add some scripts and put that somewhere on the net.
Philippe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |