|
From: | Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: | Re: GNUmail on NetBSD |
Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:34:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111229 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 |
Hi,I think this is a bit off-topic. Also, I imported lusernet to the nonfsf project, mainly because of the gnumail and pantomime affinity.
Philippe Roussel wrote:
I don't like all this version control program fiddling, that happens on the main gnustep repo, because my vote counts little, but on gap where I work since years and am co-leader, I don't want the hassle.Le 13/04/2012 20:15, Ivan Vučica a écrit : Well, GAP projects are small enough to be in a single tree but I would vote for any setup not using cvs, even if I have to learn a new tool.
If at all, I may migrate it to SVN because we use gorm file which are directories and CVS is a bit cumbersome with them. However I long maintained GAP apps on platforms where I was never able to get a running SVN (not even that exotic... mac 10.2 for example). Since I will probably drop some of them, I might change my mind.
The number of developers and general patching activity is not that big in GAP... up to little ago I was quite able to manage all the patches by myself...
Well, since I essentially gormize all apps I import into GAP, I think we are on different routes here. GORM files have drawbacks, especially with version control systems, but they are the main reason WHY I am working on GUI apps at all...Another potentialy beneficial move would to be use text files for the UIs. I find it annoying to not be able to diff 2 versions of a gorm interface but maybe that's just me :o)
I don't want to force anything on others, but I am trying to give GAP apps a certain uniformity while working on them. One of them is the interface. GAP apps end up being also show-offs of our capabilities and portability...
Riccardo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |