[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gorm - Connection inspector
From: |
Wolfgang Lux |
Subject: |
Re: Gorm - Connection inspector |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:36:45 +0200 |
Gregory Casamento wrote:
> I think it's weird that that very same code isn't causing an issue on
> Linux. Go ahead and commit the patch, but I'm suspicious that there
> is something else going on here.
It is not weird at all. The code depends on the order in which the runtime
initializes methods in categories. I submitted a patch that you committed
almost 4 years ago to remove those methods because I noticed the same problem
on Darwin at that time. See this thread on GNUstep-discuss:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2008-10/msg00055.html
Wolfgang
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, (continued)
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/07/10
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Gregory Casamento, 2012/07/10
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/07/10
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/07/11
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/07/11
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Gregory Casamento, 2012/07/11
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, A. Arias, 2012/07/12
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/07/12
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, A. Arias, 2012/07/12
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2012/07/19
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector,
Wolfgang Lux <=
- Re: Gorm - Connection inspector, Gregory Casamento, 2012/07/12