discuss-gnustep
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
clang vs gcc 4.7
From
:
Luis Garcia Alanis
Subject
:
clang vs gcc 4.7
Date
:
Sun, 3 Mar 2013 03:45:45 -0800
Hi,
I was reading that clang had support for ObjectiveC 2.0 and gcc didn't. However I also read that as of gcc 4.6 it also supports ObjectiveC 2.0.
Is there a reason clang should be used?
Etoile seems to require clang. This makes me thing clang still doing something that gcc cant.
Thanks
Luis
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Luis Garcia Alanis
<=
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Tom Davie
,
2013/03/03
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Sebastian Reitenbach
,
2013/03/03
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Richard Frith-Macdonald
,
2013/03/03
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Riccardo Mottola
,
2013/03/03
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Wolfgang Lux
,
2013/03/04
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Ivan Vučica
,
2013/03/04
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
Riccardo Mottola
,
2013/03/03
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
,
David Chisnall
,
2013/03/03
Prev by Date:
Re: New release of core libraries
Next by Date:
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
Previous by thread:
New release of core libraries
Next by thread:
Re: clang vs gcc 4.7
Index(es):
Date
Thread