[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07 |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:53:25 +0100 |
On 8 Jul 2013, at 14:44, Philippe Roussel <p.o.roussel@free.fr> wrote:
> I'd like to provide packages based on libobjc2 and clang but I'm not
> sure how. clang is a fast moving target and I would probably need to
> package its latest version to offer all functionalities. When I have
> some time...
The libobjc2 has CPack support, so it can build debian packages out of the box,
just with 'make package'. If you want to customise the packages then there are
some CPack options you can set.
Clang has a release every six months, which isn't much of a moving target.
There is already a package for the most recent release:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/clang-3.3
Although for some bizarre reason it has a hard dependency on the GCC libobjc,
which makes no sense at all.
> Off topic : clang is probably a great compiler, offering vastly superior
> functionalities that everyone should use in their projects unless they
> want to be publicly mocked and all that, but gnustep still supports
> gcc AFAIK
We attempt to support gcc, but in some cases that means things will build but
you'll get reduced functionality.
David
- Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Philippe Roussel, 2013/07/08
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Fred Kiefer, 2013/07/08
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2013/07/09
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Graham Lee, 2013/07/09
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2013/07/09
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Graham Lee, 2013/07/09
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Wolfgang Lux, 2013/07/09
- Re: Ubuntu and Debian packages / 2013-07-07, Graham Lee, 2013/07/09