[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License
From: |
Liam Proven |
Subject: |
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:07:48 +0100 |
On 18 September 2013 13:57, Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> wrote:
> Am 18.09.2013 14:52, schrieb Pirmin Braun:
>> You only have to pay extra when it turns out that you've become a
>> company using the product permanently with more than 5 concurrent
>> named users.
>
> Perhaps this distinction is too complex. Non-commercial use -> free,
> commercial use -> pay. Things have to be simple.
I agree.
Also, something simple and clear like this is *FAR* preferable to
trying to introduce a new licence.
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, (continued)
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Pirmin Braun, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Markus Hitter, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Markus Hitter, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Pirmin Braun, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Ivan Vučica, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License,
Liam Proven <=
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Liam Proven, 2013/09/19