|
From: | Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: | Re: browsing over ssh |
Date: | Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:45:34 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 |
Hi, David Chisnall wrote:
I totally stand to that. It is nto a job of the file-manager. You need ssh, other asked me to put FTP logic, others will need samba and so on. Then you have to handle all that "tmp" file stuff if the destination files are not readable or not openable with fopen(), etc etc.On 7 Nov 2013, at 18:33, "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> wrote:Has anyone managed to get GWorkspace browsing remote files? I've found Nautilus' ability to browse over SSH very handy in the past, and I'd prefer to not do it via static mounts or FUSE...I'd much prefer this kind of thing to work via FUSE. I've found the Nautilus behaviour spectacularly irritating, where you find a file, double click on it, and then discover that the app that's registered to open those files doesn't use GNOME VFS (it being under the impression that the VFS is the job of the kernel, not the file manager) and so returns an error for an invalid path. The correct way of implementing these is to have a privileged help daemon that will mount things on demand, in directories owned by the user who provided the credentials.
When I see how it works on mac or windows, I just don't like it. I never tried nautilus in that regard, to be honest. On the other hard, I don't liek FUSE either, especially outside linux, so I understand your dislike too.
On HURD it would all just work fine with a translator ;) Riccardo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |