|
From: | Gerold Rupprecht |
Subject: | Re: elementary OS |
Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:31:09 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 |
Dear Gregory, Thanks for trying to moderate our discussion, but your banning appears to me as inappropriate as well as counter-productive. I kindly request you to reverse your decision. I too find flaming remarks annoying. Banning someone who despite their abrasive tone, has taken the time and effort to install and compile GNUstep should be listened to. The person has obviously come back on several occasions, hoping there was more progress in several strategic areas, and was willing to spend their time to come back to us and investigate for himself. That alone is worth a thank you in my opinion. What he had to say was poorly thought out because he did not stick with addressing the problems, but attacked the character of individuals (to be avoided - I too felt slighted). This potential user is simply frustrated and venting off. Banning someone is disproportionate. I too appreciate civilized discussion... We clearly have to make some choices as what problems we want to tackle and when, to stay relevant. I believe with efforts in certain areas, GNUstep can still prove most useful, but the rest of the computing world is not standing still. We have to make some strategic choices to get ahead and open our code to a greater audience. I would welcome you to take the lead on launching and guiding such an important strategy discussion to increase collaboration between various contributors. Best wishes, Gerold On 10. 02. 14 19:38, Dr. H. Nikolaus
Schaller wrote:
-- Gerold Rupprecht Mobile +41 79 914 29 52 |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |