[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSImageCompressionFactor

From: Riccardo Mottola
Subject: Re: NSImageCompressionFactor
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:16:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26


Lundberg, Johannes wrote:
I mean, it works but that becomes always 0 = the best jpg quality.

I fear you are right, I just tried using PRICE, this is what I get:

-rw-r--r--  1 multix  staff    451980 May 20 16:17 linhof_00.jpg
-rw-r--r--  1 multix  staff    411706 May 20 16:16 linhof_100.jpg
-rw-r--r--  1 multix  staff    411706 May 20 16:17 linhof_25.jpg
-rw-r--r--  1 multix  staff    411706 May 20 16:17 linhof_75.jpg

it is not even true that values higher than "1" ield 0, because 0 would have a terrible quality. Here the difference seems to be very small instead, only 0 is really bigger and looks like 100.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]