Re: Copyright assignment requirement

[Ivan Vučica]

> On 31.05.2014., at 12:01, David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org> wrote:
> 
> The FSF has used the copyright grants to change the license of code from 
> GPLv2 or later to GPLv3 or later, which makes some people quite uncomfortable 
> - who knows what GPLv4 will have in it?  A lot of the companies I work with 
> have a no-GPLv3-code-in-the-door policy (and GPLv3 is not one of the licenses 
> acceptable by the grant on which I'm currently funded), which means that I'm 
> unable to use GNUstep for much that's work-related.  

Did I miss GNUstep becoming (L)GPLv3?

I see a copy of GPLv3 in Base -- but I also see GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1. I presumed 
(L)GPLv2-or-optionally-later-if-you-insist applies.