[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3
From: |
Fred Kiefer |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3 |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 21:54:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 04.06.2014 00:11, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> Hey guys. I'm thinking that we may want to move the apps back to GPL2.1+
> for the apps instead of GPLv3. While I understand many companies
> objections to GPLv3, I don't understand why it impacts GNUstep since the
> applications are the only part which are GPLv3, the libraries (the most
> important part) are LGPLv2.1+. So I am a bit confused.
>
> At any rate, since it is impacting us, I would like to put it up to a vote.
> Should we move our licensing back to GPLv2 for the applications or not?
> If so, I will make certain to tell the FSF that this is our intention and
> explain why we are doing this.
>
> Please let me know how all of you feel about this.
I don't have any strong feelings either way. If you think the licence
switch back is any good, I wont oppose you doing so.
Fred
- GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Gregory Casamento, 2014/06/03
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Stefan Bidi, 2014/06/03
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Gregory Casamento, 2014/06/04
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Daniel Berlin, 2014/06/05
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Gregory Casamento, 2014/06/05
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Alessandro Sangiuliano, 2014/06/06
- Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3, Ivan Vučica, 2014/06/07
Re: GNUstep Licensing.... GPLv2.1+ for apps instead of GPLv3,
Fred Kiefer <=