[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: segfault on solaris10/sparc
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: segfault on solaris10/sparc |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:51:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20120110 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 |
Hi,
Fred Kiefer wrote:
If you look at the code in NSData.m you will see that just before the failing
line there is an #if NEED_WORD_ALIGNMENT clause. The question now is why this
isn't defined in your case. You will have to report back the configure results
of your Sparc machine.
Hope this helps,
Yes, it helps! If I manually change that value to 1 and recompile it works.
I remember having htis topic already with Richard. I think the align
test was tweaked
Richard, do you rember?
I upgraded this box to gcc 4.9 in the meanwhile, that's the only change
I can think of.
See here:
configure:21236: checking short/int needs to be word aligned
configure:21255: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/opt/csw/include
-I/opt/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers
-I/opt/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers
-I/opt/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib/ffi -R/opt/csw/lib/ffi
-L/opt/GNUstep/Local/Library/Libraries
-L/opt/GNUstep/Local/Library/Libraries
-L/opt/GNUstep/System/Library/Libraries conftest.c -lnsl -lrt -ldl
-lpthread -lz >&5
In file included from conftest.c:211:0:
./config/config.align.c: In function 'main':
./config/config.align.c:13:16: warning: incompatible implicit
declaration of built-in function 'malloc'
char *buf = malloc(30);
^
./config/config.align.c:27:6: warning: assignment from incompatible
pointer type
sp = (short*)(v + 1);
^
./config/config.align.c:28:6: warning: assignment from incompatible
pointer type
sq = (short*)(v + 2);
^
configure:21259: $? = 0
configure:21265: ./conftest
configure:21269: $? = 0
configure:21294: result: no
However, if I do "gcc config.align.c" and then run "a.out"
$ ./a.out
Bus Error (core dumped)
That's a big fat crash... so? what's wrong with the test? this is
somehow a de-ja-vu.
Riccardo