[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Phoenix language
From: |
Gregory Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Phoenix language |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:22:50 -0400 |
Dr. Schaller,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@computer.org> wrote:
>
[ snipped.. ]
>
> I remember some discussion but wasn’t aware that such a decision was taken.
That's because I'm doing it because I am interested in doing it. I'm
not sure that we needed a discussion or decision by committee on this.
Here was the announcement of our position, which I shared with the
list:
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com/2014/06/gnusteps-position-on-swift.html
> It looks like a “I, GC” project rather than a “we, GNUstep”. So you should not
> be astonished about some reactions here.
Seriously? And here I was under the impression that when I say
something is for this project, then it is. What other reason would I
have for doing it? We have soooo much stuff in our repository, does
it seem appropriate to put a compiler in there as well? I mean if you
guys think it's appropriate to put it there on top of everything else,
I certainly can if that would make you feel more comfortable. I know
that it would facilitate people helping me with it as we wouldn't have
to go through the issues of adding people to the repo at
source.ind.ie.
I am, honestly, astonished with how good intentions can be stretched
and distorted by others to be something else. What I don't
understand, quite frankly, is that when I first joined this project we
were all very much in the spirit of doing things that we enjoyed.
Lately it seems like everyone has to go through committee and I have
to tell you I'm getting very very tired of that approach. Mainly
because it hasn't worked very well for us.
[snipped]
>> Swift, as I see it, is important for our future. Also, I wasn't sure
>> if it was a good idea to put it into GNUstep's repo. I may still put
>> a version of it there if needed.
>
> This makes me even more puzzled. Are there two versions planned?
I can have the same code in two places. This is not a new concept.
> Anyways it is a good initiative.
Thanks, at least one thing positive here.
> BR,
> Nikolaus
GC
--
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
(240)274-9630 (Cell)
http://www.gnustep.org
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
- Re: Phoenix language, (continued)
- Re: Phoenix language, Robert Slover, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Ivan Vučica, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr . H . Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, David Chisnall, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language,
Gregory Casamento <=
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22