[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Phoenix language
From: |
Gregory Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Phoenix language |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:54:26 -0400 |
Guys,
I would like very much to have your help on this effort. Anyone is
welcome to become a part of it. I will add it to the GNUstep repo as
well if you believe that's a good idea. I think what I need to do
now is consider the advice that David gave earlier and see if I can
improve on what I currently have.
I apologize if my tone has seemed somewhat defensive up until now.
GC
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Gregory Casamento
<greg.casamento@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dr. Schaller,
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
> <hns@computer.org> wrote:
>>
> [ snipped.. ]
>>
>> I remember some discussion but wasn’t aware that such a decision was taken.
>
> That's because I'm doing it because I am interested in doing it. I'm
> not sure that we needed a discussion or decision by committee on this.
> Here was the announcement of our position, which I shared with the
> list:
>
> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com/2014/06/gnusteps-position-on-swift.html
>
>> It looks like a “I, GC” project rather than a “we, GNUstep”. So you should
>> not
>> be astonished about some reactions here.
>
> Seriously? And here I was under the impression that when I say
> something is for this project, then it is. What other reason would I
> have for doing it? We have soooo much stuff in our repository, does
> it seem appropriate to put a compiler in there as well? I mean if you
> guys think it's appropriate to put it there on top of everything else,
> I certainly can if that would make you feel more comfortable. I know
> that it would facilitate people helping me with it as we wouldn't have
> to go through the issues of adding people to the repo at
> source.ind.ie.
>
> I am, honestly, astonished with how good intentions can be stretched
> and distorted by others to be something else. What I don't
> understand, quite frankly, is that when I first joined this project we
> were all very much in the spirit of doing things that we enjoyed.
> Lately it seems like everyone has to go through committee and I have
> to tell you I'm getting very very tired of that approach. Mainly
> because it hasn't worked very well for us.
>
> [snipped]
>>> Swift, as I see it, is important for our future. Also, I wasn't sure
>>> if it was a good idea to put it into GNUstep's repo. I may still put
>>> a version of it there if needed.
>>
>> This makes me even more puzzled. Are there two versions planned?
>
> I can have the same code in two places. This is not a new concept.
>
>> Anyways it is a good initiative.
>
> Thanks, at least one thing positive here.
>
>> BR,
>> Nikolaus
>
> GC
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
> http://www.gnustep.org
> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
--
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
(240)274-9630 (Cell)
http://www.gnustep.org
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
- Re: Phoenix language, (continued)
- Re: Phoenix language, Robert Slover, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Ivan Vučica, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr . H . Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, David Chisnall, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language,
Gregory Casamento <=
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22