[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Phoenix language
From: |
Gregory Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Phoenix language |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:20:56 -0400 |
Correction...
> The alternative to using these technologies is to write a hand-written
> recursive descent parser, which I've also done before when I wrote the
> parser for Gorm. The disadvantage is obvious... it's harder and
> slower and can't be automatically regenerated when/if the language
> changes.
When I say slower I mean it's slower to write it from scratch.
--
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
(240)274-9630 (Cell)
http://www.gnustep.org
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
- Re: Phoenix language, (continued)
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Ivan Vučica, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr . H . Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, David Chisnall, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/23
- Re: Phoenix language,
Gregory Casamento <=
- Re: Phoenix language, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/10/23
Re: Phoenix language, Gregory Casamento, 2014/10/22