[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CrystaX and GNUstep
From: |
Germán Arias |
Subject: |
Re: CrystaX and GNUstep |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:36:03 -0600 |
El jue, 26-03-2015 a las 01:47 -0400, Gregory Casamento escribió:
>
>
> On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Germán Arias <germanandre@gmx.es> wrote:
> El jue, 26-03-2015 a las 00:15 -0400, Gregory Casamento
> escribió:
> > German
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Germán Arias
> <germanandre@gmx.es> wrote:
> > Some weeks ago I tried to install gnustep-base on
> CrystaX [1]
> > However
> > the support for Objective-C is not complete. But
> CrystaX has
> > been
> > started a fundraising campaign [2] and one of its
> goal is
> > provide a
> > complete support for Objective-C and (depending of
> the
> > collected money)
> > frameworks like CoreData and CoreGraphics. If that
> campaign is
> > successful, it can also be great for GNUstep.
> >
> > Germán
> >
> > [1] https://www.crystax.net/en
> > [2]
> https://www.bountysource.com/teams/crystaxndk/fundraiser
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not a naysayer and what he's planning sounds beneficial.
> >
> >
> > His fundraiser doesn't seem to mention GNUstep. Is he
> thinking about
> > implementing these Cocoa compatible frameworks without
> leveraging
> > GNUstep?
>
> I think yes, but if they offers full support for Objective-C
> we will be
> able to install GNUstep (at least gnustep-base) on CrystaX
> with the
> advantage that libcrystax offers all functionalities missed on
> libc of
> android (Bionic).
>
> Germán.
>
> >
> > GC
> >
>
>
>
>
> I guess I'm confused. Why do people think implementing it themselves
> is the shorter path to success? Does he not know about GNUstep? I
> admit I was amused at the one month estimate for implementing a Cocoa
> compatible Foundation.
>
>
> GC
>
He know GNUstep. See (section 4 "Objective-C support"):
https://www.crystax.net/en/android/ndk/7
Germán