Re: [ANN] Burn 0.6.0

[Ivan Vučica]

I'd be more worried about DMARC failure that's visible by Gmail users in headers:

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;

       spf=pass (google.com: domain of discuss-gnustep-bounces+ivan=vucica.net@gnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=discuss-gnustep-bounces+ivan=vucica.net@gnu.org;

       dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@;

       dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=libero.it

Inspect libero.it's SPF and DMARC records and adjust them accordingly, so that gnu.org servers are allowed to send mails on behalf of users @libero.it:

  https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/libero.it

DMARC records currently order Gmail (and others) to quarantine emails unless they were sent by servers in SPF records:

  https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/libero.it

which seem to be some BlackBerry servers, plus those in 212.48.25.128/25 IP range.

It's possible that just adding "include:gnu.org" to libero.it's SPF record would be enough.

2015-04-12 20:51 GMT+01:00 Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola@libero.it>:

Hi,

not nice if I find myself as spam, even if the message is relayed from the list. Perhaps some of my emails did not get a reply for this reason...

Luboš Doležel wrote:

*  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
*      (riccardo.mottola[at]libero.it)

But it is not freemail, even if libero means free. It is the provider I pay for my internet connection!

*  0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
*      EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
*  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

What is this error? I don't think it is something I can do something about, or?

Riccardo

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep