discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: weak redefinition


From: David Chisnall
Subject: Re: weak redefinition
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:32:09 +0100

On 14 Apr 2015, at 15:39, Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola@libero.it> wrote:
> 
> do you have an authoritative reference to that? I wound "weak" and not 
> "__weak". A language spec or a doc from Apple would be excellent, so I can 
> argument to the NetBSD guys.

See:

https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ProgrammingWithObjectiveC/EncapsulatingData/EncapsulatingData.html

weak is a context-dependent keyword that is only valid in property 
declarations.  __weak (along with __strong / __unsafe_unretained) is a storage 
qualifier that is valid on all declarations.

David

-- Sent from my IBM 1620




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]