[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Web browser for GNUstep
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: Web browser for GNUstep |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:55:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 |
Hi,
andrewkaz wrote:
Anyone have a status on a GNUstep web browser?
you hit a topic which has been discussed to death, which is quite
complex and wide-reaching. However apart from discussion there has been
only two real "code" attempts up to now: Berkelium by Greg and
SWK/Vespucci by Nikolaus, me and Fred.
Was checking out Mantella, the wrapper around Firefox from like 2007. I may
even be close to getting it to compile! My system has Ice weasel though, not
firefox, and not sure what the associated gtkmozembed is called or how to get
it installed and importing on my Debian distro. — If anyone has pointers on
any of these things Id be extremely grateful.
I think you can sum up 3 options:
1) port an open-source browser which exists on Mac to GNUstep: e.g.
Firefox/Seamonkey, Camino, Dillo-2 or similars
2) port WebKit directly or a portable library of it like Berkelium or
CEF. Then you still need to make a Browser for it, perhaps by porting one
3) fix, extend or contribute to SWK and then still write/port a browser
I think that best would be that ALL those options would be explored and
present.
Option 1) is interesting because it could give us Gecko, which I
like/trust more than others, but sadly Gecko portable is no longer
maintained. You would get a full browser, though.
Option 2) and 3) should be worked on together.
I don't think that SWK will ever provide a full-blown browser engine
like real WebKit, however it already proves to be fast, portable and
self-contained in AppKit (which is really good): thus something ideal to
display documentaiton, quick brwosing and integrated display of
documentation in any application
Both option 2) and 3) need a browser, the core could be even exchanged!
All of these options require work. Work on SWK has been fun and there is
more potential in it than may appear: Nikolaus has a quite powerful
parser, rendering is still a bit primitive, however on Mac it is better
than GNUstep, showing that we have to catch up. SWK is precious in GUI
testing!
Greg worked on Berkelium but it itself is unmaintained now. You won't
get a browser from it.
Option 1) has been discussed and is very intersting. Think that Firefox
as been and is currently ported to 10.4: tenfourfox, Seamonkey to 10.5
for G5! Thus perhaps a GS port could work.
Or if you have pointers on another web browser that is even remotely usable.
Tried SimpleWebKit too, got it building and running and it’s either out of date
or a joke.
Where is the code to fix it? calling it a joke is a little bit offensive
for those who worked on it for years with direct personal expense.
I’ve been on the Apple scene for a long time, and feel I may be one of the
rare few who can see the grand potential of GNUstep, who wants to move it
forward.
Thanks. Those who work on it day in day out... probably see it too.
Although I personally like some encouragement, the best thing are
patches or, at least, proper bug reports.
Riccardo
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, (continued)
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Maxthon Chan, 2015/06/13
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix), 2015/06/13
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Maxthon Chan, 2015/06/13
- Message not available
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, ChanMaxthon, 2015/06/13
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Gregory Casamento, 2015/06/13
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Maxthon Chan, 2015/06/14
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Gregory Casamento, 2015/06/14
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Maxthon Chan, 2015/06/17
- Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Gregory Casamento, 2015/06/17
Re: Web browser for GNUstep, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2015/06/14
Re: Web browser for GNUstep,
Riccardo Mottola <=