discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plans for ahead


From: Gregory Casamento
Subject: Re: Plans for ahead
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:11:20 -0500

Wrapping chrome is easy given that we can use CEF (Chromium Embedded
Framework) which is designed for this purpose.  I did it in a week
when I worked for AOL and added a view based on CEF to WinAmp for Mac.
Why they made me use CEF instead of WebKit is still a complete mystery
to me, but that was the case.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Luis Garcia Alanis <luis@garcia.tv> wrote:
> But what is more expensive, write all the code to wrap chrome in gnustep or
> writing the missing dependencies? not to mention the team that made the OS X
> version will maintain the app.
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:42 PM, James Carthew <jcarthew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Porting an OSX web browser has been considered in the past. It has not
>> been completed because things such as text tables are not yet implemented
>> within GNUstep.
>>
>> On 7 December 2015 at 12:05, ChanMaxthon <xcvista@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Crazy idea for this: port the OS X version of Chromium or Firefox over?
>>> That should already been modified to use Cocoa and we just need to provide
>>> all its dependencies. The same applies for Apple's version of WebKit on
>>> which a clone of Safari can be built.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 08:53, Svetlana A. Tkachenko
>>> <svetlana@members.fsf.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Now as a desktop user who would like to run GUNstep full time, I have
>>> >> to ask, has anyone actually started making chromium embedded embed into a
>>> >> gnustep window?
>>> >> I used Mantella in the past and I was happy with it. Mantella was this
>>> >> exact idea with firefox. Unfortunately the interface to firefox they used
>>> >> was deprecated.
>>> >
>>> > About "embedding" Chromium or Firefox - I do not mind embedding the
>>> > stuff rendered by the engine (WebKit/Gecko), but I would not, as a
>>> > matter of personal preference, recommend to port over the Chromium's or
>>> > Firefox's interface. For UX consistency I would prefer the interface to
>>> > be in GNUStep things. I hope we are getting there one way or another.
>>> > :)
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Svetlana A. Tkachenko
>>> > Member of the Free Software Foundation
>>> > www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org www.freenode.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>>> > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>>> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>



-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]