[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED)
|
From: |
David Chisnall |
|
Subject: |
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:15:46 +0000 |
On 28 Jan 2016, at 19:52, Niels Grewe <niels.grewe@halbordnung.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:29 schrieb David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org>:
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2016, at 15:12, Tristan Bellogi <bellogi@orange.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Debian clang.deb install libobjc4, Apple has libobjc4, Gunstep recommends
>>> its own libobjc2 ?
>>
>> Debian appends a version number to the GCC libobjc package. It supports the
>> same features of Objective-C as GCC (i.e. nothing vaguely recent). It is
>> absolutely not the one that you want. Please complain to the Debian clang
>> maintainer that it’s pulling in this dependency, as it’s not the one that he
>> wants.
>
> Actually I filed a bug report a about that a while ago [0], suggesting to
> drop the dependency to a recommendation, but unfortunately that didn’t elicit
> a response yet.
From the output that Svetlana has shown me, it also looks as if the Debian
clang packages are no longer able to find any headers. If anyone knows Debian
people, it’s probably worth poking them and asking them to sort out their
toolchain situation.
David
-- Sent from my Apple II