|From:||H. Nikolaus Schaller|
|Date:||Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:07:39 +0100|
Looks as if you didn't follow all the details of the discussions.
Some persons stated that they will leave the list because they don't like discussions.
And the "warning of participants with more sensitive disposition" and indirect call for
moderators I was citing above, is essentially the same direction. To stop discussion...
Hence my pointed proposal :)
Yes, this is an obvious situation.
IMHO personal attacks usually have two opponents. It is sometimes very difficult to find out who did throw the first stone. Some people already see it as a personal attack if their arguments are not listened to. Then, they try to reformulate and put more and more push into being understood. And after a while they are called penetrant etc. which is of course a comment about the person and no longer their intention and they start to defend by addressing the other persons. But who was first? Who is guilty?
That is something I can agree with and find it attractive.
BR and happy coding,
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|