[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:53:57 +0000 |
On 25 Dec 2018, at 18:30, Bertrand Dekoninck <bertrand.dekoninck@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> - port rik to objc1 and have it up-to-date on ppc.
Is this really a good use of your time? One of the problems with GNUstep is
the perception that we’re stuck with a 30-year-old framework and a 20-year-old
version of a language (which is somewhat dated even in its latest incarnation).
If you care about PowerPC, why not work on supporting a modern Objective-C
dialect on PowerPC, rather than on rewriting everything that you want to use in
an archaic one?
As far as I know, clang should be able to target PowerPC and libobjc2 should
run happily on PowerPC (though will be missing objc_msgSend and
imp_implementationWithBlock unless someone wants to contribute the PowerPC
assembly versions - they’re not that hard if you know the target assembly, but
I have no interest in PowerPC so no motivation to learn another new ISA just to
write a couple of dozen lines of code for it).
David
- Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Josh Freeman, 2018/12/23
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Riccardo Mottola, 2018/12/25
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Bertrand Dekoninck, 2018/12/25
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Patryk Laurent, 2018/12/26
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, David Chisnall, 2018/12/27
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2018/12/27
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Andreas Fink, 2018/12/27
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, David Chisnall, 2018/12/27
- Re: Some GNUstep discussions in other forums, Bertrand Dekoninck, 2018/12/26