[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brutal review…
From: |
Xavier |
Subject: |
Re: Brutal review… |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2023 20:31:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Le 19 octobre 2023 16:50:37 GMT+02:00, Riccardo Mottola
<riccardo.mottola@libero.it> a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>Daniel Boyd wrote:
>> Right—your packages install into /usr/local instead of /usr/GNUstep, right?
>>
>> I kind of like the /usr/GNUstep setup, but I could also see the Debian
>> people preferring the other. I think the official packages should
>> probably mirror what Debian would want.
>If we provide our reference packages, they should install in
>/usr/GNUstep or, even better, in /System, /Local: that is the "real" GS
>experience in my opinion. So that you open GWorkspace and see your apps
>in /System/Applications or /Local/Applications
What about using /opt/GNUstep with symlinks for /System and /Local ?
It would help users to locate GnuStep things, to add applications wrappers and
to clean system in case of a self compiled install.
It would also to install incompatible libs version.
And it would simplify things for beginners.
Xavier
- Re: Brutal review…, (continued)
- Re: Brutal review…, Andreas Fink, 2023/10/18
- Re: Brutal review…, Daniel Boyd, 2023/10/18
- Re: Brutal review…, Andreas Fink, 2023/10/18
- Re: Brutal review…, Daniel Boyd, 2023/10/18
- Re: Brutal review…, Thomas, 2023/10/19
- Re: Brutal review…, Riccardo Mottola, 2023/10/19
- Re: Brutal review…,
Xavier <=
Re: Brutal review…, Riccardo Mottola, 2023/10/17