[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCA-Activists] regarding list noise
From: |
David Turner |
Subject: |
Re: [DMCA-Activists] regarding list noise |
Date: |
23 Apr 2003 19:51:19 -0400 |
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 19:17, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Seth's reposts were fascinating, but this *isn't* a complete unmoderated
> list, is it? Perhaps I should clarify that I was responding in particular
> to this:
Sorry. I switched the list to moderated, and then discovered that
mailman wasn't properly notifying me about posts. So, I sent the
backlog through. I should have checked more carefully, sorry.
Anyway, I set the list unmoderated (members-only). I'll still bounce
off-topic messages that get moderated because they're cross-posts, or
because they're from non-members. If there get to be too many messages
which I don't bounce, let me know and I'll try to take the list
moderated again.
> I assumed that dmca-activists was likewise closed to non-members (the norm
> due to spam, no?), and thus the presence of these messages in my
> mailbox meant that someone had explicitly moderated them through. I was
> voicing my preference that this not be done in the future, except for
> directly-relevant announcements, minutes, etc. Discussion IMO being best
> restricted to among list members, rather than among the world entire.
>
> But perhaps I was wrong. I suppose in that case I fall back on requesting
> the standard -announce/-discuss split, sigh.
>
> Enough of out me, or the email about the noise will outshout the noise.
> --scott
>
> DES DNC counter-intelligence Khaddafi Diplomat Leitrim DC Kojarena
> shortwave D5 SLBM explosives Yeltsin EZLN FBI algorithm Attache ammunition
> ( http://cscott.net/ )
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DMCA-Activists mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dmca-activists
--
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
- [DMCA-Activists] IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, Seth Johnson, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [fsl-discuss] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, tompoe, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [fsl-discuss] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, iriXx, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [Patents] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, Russell McOrmond, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [Patents] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, Xavi Drudis Ferran, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] Re: [Patents] Re: IBM, Microsoft, BEA Snub W3C, iriXx, 2003/04/23
- [DMCA-Activists] regarding list noise, C. Scott Ananian, 2003/04/23
- Re: [DMCA-Activists] regarding list noise, Seth Finkelstein, 2003/04/23
- Re: [DMCA-Activists] regarding list noise,
David Turner <=
- [DMCA-Activists] Appropriate content for dmca-activists., C. Scott Ananian, 2003/04/23