[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH] Fix System Slot Information for PCIe SSD
From: |
Prabhakar.Pujeri |
Subject: |
Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH] Fix System Slot Information for PCIe SSD |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:17:59 +0000 |
Hi Jean,
Thanks for reviewing my patch. I will submit new version of patch.
---
Prabhakar
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Delvare <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 1:14 PM
To: Pujeri, Prabhakar
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [dmidecode] [PATCH] Fix System Slot Information for PCIe SSD
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hi Prabhakar,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:08:50 +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Prabhakar pujeri <address@hidden>
Please always include a description.
> ---
> dmidecode.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/dmidecode.c b/dmidecode.c index aef18f8..c87bc8a 100644
> --- a/dmidecode.c
> +++ b/dmidecode.c
> @@ -1906,7 +1906,9 @@ static const char *dmi_slot_length(u8 code)
> "Other", /* 0x01 */
> "Unknown",
> "Short",
> - "Long" /* 0x04 */
> + "Long",
> + "2.5\" drive form factor",
> + "3.5\" drive form factor" /* 0x06 */
> };
Good catch, this has been in the specification since version 3.0 and nobody
noticed. My bad. However...
> if (code >= 0x01 && code <= 0x04)
... you clearly did not test your patch on any affected system, as this test
makes your change above a no-op. You need to adjust the upper boundary of the
test to match the new array size.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support