[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC

From: Gopal.V
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:48 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> No.  "unmanaged" means native-code, not IL.
> Probably you mean "unverifiable".
        To err is human, but to blame it on the computer is ingenious.

        Actually I re-checked the MSDN and it turns out that I'm
speaking about "unsafe" and "managed extensions". ie "__gc" "__value"
stuff for calling unmanaged code.
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]