[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and G

From: Gopal.V
Subject: Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 15:57:00 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> >         I think the first step towards a CodeDom would be completing the
> > System.Reflection.Emit classes.
> System.CodeDom is part of the "System" assembly, but it

        Well, I think Reflection is needed anyway (dependency) ?.

> Or just use Mono's implementation, as they already have it?
> I would consider it to be a "high-level library".

Yes, it would be wise to use it rather than duplicate it.

> already too many C# compilers - we don't need another.
        two's company , three's a crowd ? (even for free C# compilers ?) 

> Any volunteers to try to adapt the Mono implementation
> for use in pnetlib?

        How and what parts ?.


BTW: I'm working on HttpWebRequest class -- neither Mono or DotGNU
     has that class. (reduce,reuse,recycle code !)
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]