Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?

[David Sugar]

Also, if the project is to become GNU, Peter needs to review and agree 
to the GNU maintainer policies.

Barry Fitzgerald wrote:

> I'll second that (Ack - sorry I couldn't get back on this sooner, just
> finished an extra long work week)...
>
> The next step, Peter, is to put together a summary of your project and a
> basic (very basic) roadmap for development of the project so that we can
> forward that up to RMS to have a look at - and thus make the project
> official GNU, if that's something that you would like.
>
>         -Barry
>
>
>
> David Sugar wrote:
>
> > I believe it is...
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Silvernerd wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I just realized that for the creation of Forum on Savannah it doesn't
> > > need to be officially DotGNU. It can suffice if it is officially an
> > > active development proposal. If it gets that status I can start the
> > > project registration process on Savannah.
> > >
> > > Am I right to assume that Forum already is an active development
> > > proposal? If so I can get this show on the road.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Silvernerd (Peter Minten)
> > >
> > > "Using GNU/Linux is like walking over a ray of bricks, not as beautiful,
> > > but a lot more substantial than light."
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Developers mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://subscribe.dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers