[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?

From: David Sugar
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:09:47 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204

Also, if the project is to become GNU, Peter needs to review and agree to the GNU maintainer policies.

Barry Fitzgerald wrote:

I'll second that (Ack - sorry I couldn't get back on this sooner, just
finished an extra long work week)...

The next step, Peter, is to put together a summary of your project and a
basic (very basic) roadmap for development of the project so that we can
forward that up to RMS to have a look at - and thus make the project
official GNU, if that's something that you would like.


David Sugar wrote:

I believe it is...

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Silvernerd wrote:

Hi folks,

I just realized that for the creation of Forum on Savannah it doesn't
need to be officially DotGNU. It can suffice if it is officially an
active development proposal. If it gets that status I can start the
project registration process on Savannah.

Am I right to assume that Forum already is an active development
proposal? If so I can get this show on the road.

Silvernerd (Peter Minten)

"Using GNU/Linux is like walking over a ray of bricks, not as beautiful,
but a lot more substantial than light."

Developers mailing list

Developers mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]