[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project inform

From: S11001001
Subject: Re: "Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project information)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 22:23:05 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020608

S11001001 wrote:
It really depends. Exactly who belongs in the WIW? i.e., I wouldn't presume that I'm important enough to be in the WIW, and I think that some here might share that feeling. Certainly in some cases it's obvious though.

I mean about themselves, not me ;)

Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' --

My views about copyright take an hour to expound, but one general
principle applies: it cannot justify denying the public important
freedoms. As Abraham Lincoln put it, "Whenever there is a conflict
between human rights and property rights, human rights must prevail."
Property rights are meant to advance human well-being, not as an
excuse to disregard it.
        -- RMS, "The GNU GPL and the American Way"

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]