[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET)

From: Gopal V
Subject: Re: How portable is it ? (was: [DotGNU]Embedding Portable.NET)
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:09:41 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, Erik van der Poel wrote:

> Mozilla's Tinderbox seems to be available:
> This might serve as a starting point.

That is an accountability tool .... (when you have more than 10
... explosion ....)  . Since we don't have 10 people (scarcely 2)
on the VM/Compiler side of business , I don't think we can use
Tinderbox ..... and also it needs Bonsai .. etc ......

I don't want to see 

"rhys"  --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys"  --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys"  --- green --- green -- ......
"rhys"  --- green --- green -- ......

That reduces motivation to actually check this thing ;)

The ideal solution is distribute the work load as rhys has done here.

Also the Tinderbox is an effort to place the blame on the erring 
developer in a bunch of developers ..... 

But once we have more that one developer on the compiler/vm regularly
we could think of a Tinderbox. 

Anyway thanks for the suggestion. (caused me to take a closer look at 
lxr,bonsai and tinderbox)

The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]