[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DotGNU]illegal? iieee! (was Re: flexible for users, or flexible for dev
From: |
S11001001 |
Subject: |
[DotGNU]illegal? iieee! (was Re: flexible for users, or flexible for developers?) |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:03:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020703 |
Boris Kolar wrote:
SSSCA, patenting most basic ideas,...).
Hey, that's CBDTPA, not SSSCA ;)
Some patents are amazingly stupid and they realy prevent innovation. Why can't
we simply ignore them? What can they do? It's an
international project, so such stupid patents and laws surely don't (and won't)
apply everywhere. I mean: who says US legislation
applies to this project?
Read "Harm from the Hague" (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/hague.html).
And what do you think orgs like WIPO exist for? To muscle countries into
honoring patents and copyrights in other countries.
--
Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://www.dotgnu.org
This societal shift is letting users take back control of their
futures. Just as the Magna Carta gave rights to British subjects, the
GPL enforces consumer rights and freedoms on behalf of the users of
computer software.
-- Evan Leibovitch, "Who's Afraid of Big Bad Wolves"
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), (continued)
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Volunteers wanted for sponsorships stuff (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/29
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/29
- [DotGNU]illegal? iieee! (was Re: flexible for users, or flexible for developers?),
S11001001 <=