[DotGNU]Professional online tech support for GNU/Linux?

[Andrew Clausen]

Hi all,

I've been thinking that an online professional tech support system
(support.gnu.org?) would be really good for GNU/Linux.  $$$ for
developers, and a nice method for users for getting support.  I'm sort
of thinking something like advogato.org's trust metric system plus
some e-commerce stuff.

I've written a bit about this here:

        http://members.optushome.com.au/clausen/ideas/online-tech-support.txt

And I'm cutting and pasting it below to encourage you to respond ;)
(Easier to quote ;)

So, is this relevant to dotGNU?  How would you dotGNU'ers implement it?

Cheers,
Andrew

------------

Developers of software know their code, and are probably good
at providing tech support.  Also, they're likely to know who
else knows the program well enough to give quality tech support.

There are two types of users: those who have more time than
money, and those with more money than time.  Developers like helping
those who help themselves (falling into the first category), and
presumebly those that pay them money ;)  However, there's no easy
avenue today for developers to help those in the second category.
I'd like to fill that gap with an online professional support system.
Such a support system should minimize the amount of time the user has
to spend, and require no "intelligence" from them.

I think there are a few challenges with such a system:
 * which techie "owns" which issue?  How is locking resolved?  (Problem:
DoS attacks?)
 * how is price determined?
 * when is an issue "dealt with"?
 * what happens if a user isn't satisfied?
 * how do we encourage quality?
 * money is sensitive stuff!  What security is necessary?
 * how should it interface with GNU/Linux companies, like Red Hat and friends?
 * what's a simple, easy UI?

I think some of these issues can be dealt with trust metrics.  Raph
Levien's PhD-in-progress is a good read: www.levien.com/thesis.
Trust metrics are non-trivial, especially when you want to resist
large-scale attacks.  Anyway, I think techies could probably certify each
other.  Users could then specify minimum levels of trust for people who
can answer.  Or, perhaps they can just use trust metrics to help them in
their decision on whether to accept someone.  Unsatisfied users could
contact certifiers of the techie, and ask them to revoke certification
if things aren't resolved appropriately.  Trust metrics can also be used
to link up GNU/Linux companies into the system.  They could either get
their their company as a whole certified (by developers/whatever), or
individuals within the company.

Wrt bargaining on price: there is a wide variety of skill in support
providers, and a wide range in $$$ of clients.  Also, it's not clear when
support has been finished, how long it will take, etc.  So, here's
my solution:
        (1) at any time, the user can deposit or withdraw money into/from
        his "problem account".  There is one problem account per support
        issue.
        (2) at any time, the supporter can deposit or withdraw money
        from the "problem account".
This is a Good Solution TM, because both parties have control.
The user can control his exposure to the risk of an unscrupulous
tech support person, and the techie can get the money he wants,
as he is providing support, without risking the user running
off without paying.  "pay as you go".


So, here's a first attempt at a UI for openning support requests:

        contact-method: [user name in DB, or email or irc-server+nick, etc.]
        one-line-summary: ______________
        estimate of $$$:  _____
        min-level of trust: [pick from a list]
        extra details: _______________

Once that happens, users get contacted, and eventually choose someone to
help them.  (Or alternatively: automatically choose someone with trust >= MIN,
if they want the issue handled "asynchronously").  Users should be able
to be supported in the way they prefer: IRC, email, ICQ, etc.  I guess it's
up to developers to get lots of clients.  (Remember the Golden Rule!  "He
who has the gold makes the rules."  Don't you love fortune?!)