[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and busines
From: |
Timothy Rue |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business) |
Date: |
11 Jul 2002 16:55:1 -0500 |
On 11-Jul-02 12:27:26 Peter Minten <address@hidden> wrote:
PM> Norbert Bollow wrote:
>>
>> Besides hoping to get protection from an organisation with "one
>> body rule methodology" (yes, one of the things that FreeDevelopers
>> had promised was to give us is this protection), there's another
>> way of protecting yourself:
>>
>> Look at what Rhys has done.
>>
>> He has set up a company called "Southern Storm Software, Pty
>> Ltd" which has a single employee (Rhys). From a legal
>> perspective, DotGNU Portable.NET is not produced by Rhys, but
>> rather by this company. This makes it much more difficult to
>> personally harass Rhys through lawsuits of any kind.
>>
>> Only the truly paranoid would think that this kind of protection is
>> necessary also for small-time contributors to Free Software
>> projects. But if you're planning to do something of true
>> significance (and from your earlier comments about "network
>> operating system" stuff I think this may be the case) then I'll
>> strongly recommend that you should set up such a
>> "self-incorporation".
PM> I don't know about the requirments in other parts of the world
PM> for setting up a corporate body (to give the owners legal
PM> protection) but here in the Netherlands you need a 2 or more
PM> persons to set up the stuff and I believe there were some other
PM> requirments. Wouldn't it be best to provide a DotGNU corporation
PM> for this stuff (the folks needing legal protection would probably
PM> qualify as employees anyway) since some of us might not be able
PM> to start a corporation? I know bizplan died, but with
PM> FreeDevelopers going down it could be useful to give the concept
PM> another try.
Perhaps this is something of a GNU business focus project to create.
Where the general project description and goal is set and those in teh
variosu countries and laws can check on and collect the required
information in to the project. I guess it would be a something of a GNU
GPL Document type of project??? Would Lawrence Lessig be interested in
contributing or acting in some capacity here?
I'm also thinking www.pubsoft.org type of assistant involved in a process
that might include this sort of "protection" project of reference to it.
---
Timothy Rue
Email @ mailto:address@hidden
Web @ http://www.mindspring.com/~timrue/
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), (continued)
- [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Boris Kolar, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, D.I.Freeman, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]freedom and the "quality of [GNU/]Linux" (was Re: DotGNU and business), S11001001, 2002/07/10
- [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Peter Minten, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business),
Timothy Rue <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Volunteers wanted for sponsorships stuff (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/29
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/29
- [DotGNU]illegal? iieee! (was Re: flexible for users, or flexible for developers?), S11001001, 2002/07/10