[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )

From: Gopal V
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Swig and C# (was: Strategy for dealing with C++ )
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:13:55 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> OK gopal. I see your point. I am looking at the Libxml right now, but
> it seems that the xsharp is cleaner code, he does not use any local
> functions. 

Yes the libxml2 wrappers in CVS of dotgnu-libs were handcoded ... But there
is another being built using the libxml2-api.xml file distributed with 
the libxml2 CVS ... The latter does not use C call-ins like xsharp.

But I cannot check it in till Daniel Veillard adds struct members to 
the "<struct/>" tags (which I'm manually adding for testing ,to some structs)
and Rhys finishes off the PInvoke stuff. So then I can build a nice SAX 
framework with libxml2 as well improve the DOM stuff dotgnu.xml already

The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]