[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU](no subject)

From: Gopal V
Subject: Re: [DotGNU](no subject)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:58:33 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> I'll poke around in the ECMA spec and try to figure out what the rule is so 
> that "callvirt" can be fixed too.  There is a rule that "instance" should be 
> added automatically to method definition signatures, but this is a method 
> reference instead.  More care is needed for references.

Hmm... I thought we could use "callvirt" only on instance methods ? ...

(so if I get I_METHOD as callvirt, it should be ok to force the method def
 to instance callconv ?).

> not to confuse the poor boy Gopal. :-)

Sorry ... I should really stop rambling :)

The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]